Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#16009 closed enhancement (fixed)
Compute rank of elliptic curve defined over relative number field
Reported by:  mmasdeu  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage6.2 
Component:  elliptic curves  Keywords:  descent, rank, elliptic curve, relative number field 
Cc:  cremona, pbruin  Merged in:  
Authors:  Marc Masdeu  Reviewers:  Peter Bruin 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  8bceb36 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  8bceb36e55fe51e86815f8432eec201d401595ea 
Dependencies:  #16022  Stopgaps: 
Description
Currently the following fails:
sage: x = QQ['x'].gen() sage: F.<a> = QuadraticField(5) sage: K.<b> = F.extension(x^23) sage: E = EllipticCurve(K,[0,0,0,b,1]) sage: E.rank()
This is because the sage function wrapping around Denis Simon's twodescent script does not consider relative number fields.
I propose an easy fix for it.
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by
 Branch set to u/mmasdeu/gp_simon_relative
 Cc cremona pbruin added
 Commit set to 2085e0c096a1a18a15d8dbcdde06627749b90542
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by
 Reviewers set to Peter Bruin
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Looks good and passes all tests. The new doctest does take a long time (4 minutes), but that is probably hard to avoid. Two comments:
 use your real name for the "Authors" field
 the documentation line starting with "An example with" should be indented
After fixing those, feel free to set this to positive review.
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by
Please try to find a shorter doctest! Even when tagged with "long time" 4 minutes is going to add quite a lot to the testing time.
But thanks for doing this, anyway.
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by
 Commit changed from 2085e0c096a1a18a15d8dbcdde06627749b90542 to 6a54aa459703a03350952ae22cedd8d3f190ce73
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
6a54aa4  Fixed indentation problem in doctest.

comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by
 Commit changed from 6a54aa459703a03350952ae22cedd8d3f190ce73 to 522aa2f9b87a59d22acc1cb8a2ab66dec808fab5
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
522aa2f  Found an example for the doctest that takes much less to terminate (about 4s).

comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
comment:7 Changed 8 years ago by
This long example, and the special lim1
and limtriv
in your last commit, make it sound like a good moment to look into #9322, which should generally speed up simon_two_descent()
by changing the parameters.
comment:8 Changed 8 years ago by
comment:9 Changed 8 years ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
The doctest in the last commit turns out to break (return an incorrect result) after #11005. Marc and I could reproduce this using Simon's script inside gp
. We will mark the doctest with # known bug
and report the bug to Denis Simon.
comment:10 Changed 8 years ago by
 Dependencies set to #16022
comment:11 Changed 8 years ago by
 Commit changed from 522aa2f9b87a59d22acc1cb8a2ab66dec808fab5 to 8bceb36e55fe51e86815f8432eec201d401595ea
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
db79035  Merge branch 'develop' into gp_simon_relative

a92a80e  Changed the doctest to make it independent of variable output.

275e4be  fix a bug in Denis Simon's 2descent program

8bceb36  Merge branch 'u/pbruin/16022simon_two_descent_bug' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into gp_simon_relative

comment:12 Changed 8 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
I merged #16022 and now the it passes the doctests.
comment:13 Changed 8 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:14 Changed 8 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/mmasdeu/gp_simon_relative to 8bceb36e55fe51e86815f8432eec201d401595ea
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
New commits:
Allow for relative number fields to be passed to two_descent function.
Fixed a doctest.
Added some comments.