Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#3073 closed Bug (invalid)
CLI documentation clarifications needed
Reported by: | RichardNeill | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | None Set |
Component: | CLI | Version: | 1.92 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | cli documentation seed trackerless |
Cc: |
Description
The transmissioncli documentation is somewhat sparse: one man page and no online userguide.
For example, the man page doesn't actually say how you should seed a new torrent. (It's obvious after the fact, but when I started, why would I expect to put the file I want to publish into my *download* directory)
Also if I create a trackerless torrent (without the -a) option, then I can start seeding it, and give the .torrent to another machine, but how is the second machine supposed to know where to find the seeder? This isn't documented anywhere that I can find, and it leaves me rather puzzled?
It would be nice if transmission-cli had some documentation on how to use it as a substitute for scp (as a simple example). For instance, the following would be an ideal starting point for the man page (except that it doesn't actually work, and I don't know why):
On machine "seed" (192.168.0.1), create a sample file:
mkdir download_dir echo "Hello World" > download_dir/hello.txt
Then create a trackerless torrent:
transmissioncli -n download_dir/hello.txt hello.torrent
Start this seeding:
transmissioncli -er -w download_dir hello.torrent
On machine "client" (192.168.0.2), get a copy of hello.torrent (via scp/rsync/http/whatever)
Start client downloading:
transmissioncli -er -w download_dir hello.torrent
The problem is that "client" has no way to know that it should look at 192.168.0.1 to start building a DHT...and the answer to how it should find out would be really really nice to have in the man page!
Thanks - Richard
P.S. Another really useful document to have would be how to use transmission as a substitute for multiple instances of rsync.
Change History (2)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by Longinus00
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by charles
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from new to closed
Longinus00's two points about transmission-cli's future and BitTorrent?'s suitability as an scp substitute are dead-on. I'd also add that, even if transmission did have an expansive user manual, these fringe use cases would not be covered in them.
I've already responded to your question in the forum but I'd like to point out that transmisison-cli is being depreciated in the future. Also, bitorrent is a poor substitute for rsync if you're trying to send file deltas instead of whole files.